Skip Nav

The “real monster” of Mary W. Shelley’s “Frankenstein”.

The Frankenstein Complex

❶Send the link below via email or IM Copy.

How to cite this page

Downloading prezi...
The Perception of a Monster
Who can edit:

Scientists become their projects "… science might provide society with the facts relevant to making moral decisions, but it steers clear of any ethical debate Abandons his creation because he is horrified that someone will find out what he has done. Being for the Benifit of Victor Frankenstein. More presentations by brenna sheridan Vision.

Blog 31 August Prezi at Dreamforce The proof of concept Latest posts. Creating downloadable prezi, be patient. Delete comment or cancel. Cancel Reply 0 characters used from the allowed. Send link to edit together this prezi using Prezi Meeting learn more: This tenderness changes when he begins to resent human kind. He does not seem to realize that his creation only became a monster after Frankenstein refused to accept and care for him.

If Frankenstein had realized the importance of educating, and nourishing his creation, the creation would have never turned into a monster. In my blog post I talked about nature vs. I think this ties into who the real monster is. Because the creature was not nurtured, and because he was treated so maliciously, this is why he turned vindictive.

I agree with your blog post. Maybe the real monster in this situation is Victor Frankenstein and mankind. Frankenstein deprived the creature of a family, childhood, nurturing relationships and a companion and no matter who one is, if you were deprived of such things, you may also become bitter and mean. Also the family that was scared of him and Felix who violently attacked the creature, may also be the monsters.

They did not even give him a chance, they immediately assumed he was bad because of his outer appearance. This goes to show that without looking at the creature, he was liked and valued as a human being.

I agree with you, Josh. I really like how you summarized how society taints us, because it is very true. I wish you well on you paper. Mary Shelley's book has always been a great one to get the brain gears turning. First off why the need to be so attacking of my article? Most literature teachers will agree that it is either Victor or Society that is in the wrong.

I wrote this paper based on that assumption. I see Victor of being the one in the wrong, the one who is the true "monster. And throughout the novel, Victors creation is rejected time and time again be society. His entire existence is one of shame, rejection, deprivation, and injustice.

I really believe you are getting lost in what I defined as a monster. To be forced away from your only home without food, shelter, understanding? From a psychological standpoint, it is not like the monster registers on a scale with sociopaths and psychopaths.

Everything he did was tough to him. Victor killed his mate, so he killed Victors wife, etc I really don't feel the need to counter your view. We all have our interpretations on the book. My article was my interpretation on the novel that got me an A from my teacher who just happens to have a Ph. It's a very thorough and well presented essay, and I am writing one myself about Mary Shelley's portrayal of monsters. However my main point is that Society is the true monster.

As I understand that the monster is a product of society's nurture and lack of Viktor's nurture , I similarly understand, that Viktor is a product of society's nurture as well. Viktor is only a materialistic snob because that was what society, in the nineteenth century, nurtured him to be. He was rich and therefore spoilt unconditionally by the nineteenth century. So rather then Viktor or his creation being the monster, the real monster is society.

You are very very wrong. Victor was the victim of the Being who killed most of his family. Nobody cares if his feelings were justified. A person's true value is determined by others. When somebody is going around killing all the judges, that person will not get a very good score. Society may have created the being, but that is not the question, is it? At first, yes, the Being was judged by its appearance, but after everyone got to sit down with him, see what he was like, and maybe get throttled, he was still a monster.

A monster, in your definition, is "evil, inhumane, and lacks remorse or caring for things that a normal, emotional human being should care for" Like life? People rejected him, not because they thought he was evil, but because he was ugly I would have done the same with you. Yet, you said Victor was the monster. You said Victor was possessive of Elizabeth.

In Victor's time, women were viewed as property. You said Victor was driven towards fame, but he was driven by the pursuit of knowledge, in no way intending to get famous.

You said Victor was wrongly hostile towards a creepy, giant visiting him at night. I would love to see, in that situation, you giving the Being a hug. Also, after his little brother was killed, You said that hostility was misplaced. You then said Victor did not make the Being look good. He is a scientist, not a contestant on project runway. Then Victor, after a death threat from the Being, promises to create a companion for the Being.

After seeing the death of two of his loved ones at the hand of the Being, Victor is reculant to have another two die with the new creature.

So, he destroyed it. Victor did nothing but create the being. All actions that followed could not have been foreseen by Victor. At the end of the novel, the Being does want Victor to suffer by sending him on a wild goose chase and giving him just enough food to survive.

After Victor dies the Being had nothing left to accomplish. The Being was interpreted as he was because of what he did. If he had been less hostile towards everyone, he could have been a human, but he is not. He is and always will be a monster. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.

HubPages and Hubbers authors may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others. To provide a better website experience, owlcation. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: The True Monster Updated on April 23, The Perception of a Monster It has often been argued that the definition of a monster is something inhuman, something or someone who has no regard for life and nature and that which is good.

The Frankenstein Complex The Frankenstein Complex was born out of such harsh judgments against beings of the unknown. He turns everything upside down; he disfigures everything; he loves deformity, monsters. Victor is the Monster Victor is the monster in this horror novel by Mary Shelley, because he possesses many of the characteristics that define what a monster is. Online Book and Anaylsis Literature. Frankenstein From a general summary to chapter summaries to explanations of famous quotes, the SparkNotes Frankenstein Study Guide has everything you need to ace quizzes, tests, and essays.

Analysis of "Frankenstein" by Mary Shelley: Morality Without God Throughout Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, knowledge of the existence of a creator has a crippling effect on the creature as he struggles to reconcile his own perception of himself with his maddening desire for divine approval and acceptance. Selfish Victor is, by his own nature, a very selfish person. Rejection at Birth When the Creature is first born, he is introduced to the world in the most heartless of ways.

The Bloom of Compassion The Creature is not the monster in this novel despite all of the rejection that he has faces, because he still shows compassion toward others. Rejected on Sight While the Creature is a person of compassion and has a longing for someone to have companionship with, his sweet nature cannot hold up against the rejection of society. Even in Death, There was no Joy The one act that proves that the Creature is not a monster is the fact that even when he learns of Victor death, he feels no joy, only a sense of finality.


Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Jan 26,  · Victor Frankenstein’s creation, in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, “is referred to as a monster, yet throughout the novel the reader is made aware of the compassion and morality that Victor’s” creature possesses (Clapper).Reviews:

Privacy FAQs

Victor Frankenstein: The Real Monster of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein Essay - Victor Frankenstein: The Real Monster Science is a broad field that covers many aspects of everyday life and existence. Some areas of science include the study of the universe, the environment, dinosaurs, animals, and insects.

About Our Ads

One the other hand Viktor Frankenstein looks like a man in his external but his internal being is a real selfish monster. Conclusion: Mary Shelley seems to call the reader not to forget about the spiritual development in the thirst for scientific discoveries. Frankenstein is a classic horror novel, but with a twist of many other genres. Written by Mary Shelley, it was a novel which mixed many exciting elements, such as horror, drama and romance. The story follows a young doctor named Victor Frankenstein, who has an obsession to reincarnate the dead, but.

Cookie Info

Essay: “Who is the real monster in Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein?” Mary Shelley’s objective was to write a novel about how important, or not appearances are. Mary Shelley’s objective was to write a novel about how important, or not appearances are. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein Role of Identity in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein In the Novel Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, Victor Frankenstein Is the True Monster, Not the Creature Himself.4/4(1).